LEANNA MAE .ORG
  • Home
  • About Leanna
  • My Christian Faith
    • My faith journey
    • Written by an Apostolic Pentecostal woman
    • bible study from The Subject of Salvation
    • Bible reading schedules
  • My books
    • where to purchase
    • Happily Frugal
    • The Subject of Salvation
    • Lessons on the Author Life
    • press kit
  • My blogs
    • topical blog directory
    • timeline blog directory
    • the scroll
  • Maternal Infant Wellness Education
  • Classes I teach
  • Birth & Breastfeeding Support
    • Doula Leanna
  • Shop
  • Donate
  • Contact
 

1 Corinthians 11 and uncut hair: Why I completely stopped cutting my hair

14/9/2022

53 Comments

 
Picture
I had read it, but I didn’t process it. I didn’t study it. In the 5 years I had been Christian, I’d never heard a minister preach on hair length or even gender distinction at all. Several times I had read Corinthians without stopping to think on this issue. After all, it’s become so common in American culture for women to have short hair and men now having long hair that it’s easy to forget how many hundreds of years went by that this was unaccepted. Was the tradition of short hair for men and long hair for women cultural or biblical?
 
One of the first things I noticed when I was new to the Apostolic Pentecostal church was the women were all wearing skirts, dressed modestly, and their hair was usually long. Not only was it long, but it looked natural. No dye, no unnatural color, no highlights, no layers, no chopped appearance. I came to learn that for most of them their hair was uncut. Yes, they do not cut their hair. Traditionally, they do not even trim it.
 
I had never heard of any church or denomination teaching this. I certainly didn’t mind the look. I’ve always loved long hair. I’ve had short hair several times when I was younger, and I hated it. I prefer my hair hip length if I can get it to grow that long. All these women at church looked so beautiful. They looked so feminine, but in a different way. It wasn’t feminine in a worldly way with makeup and nails and accessories to strut a womanly look. It was deeper than that, purer than that. In a way, it fascinated me to see this whole group of people look like men and women used to. It felt like finding something of old that you don’t see often anymore.
 
But why did they all follow this way?
 
1 Corinthians 11:3-16 (NASB)
 
3 But I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ.
 
4 Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head.
 
5 But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying disgraces her head, for it is one and the same as the woman whose head is shaved.
 
6 For if a woman does not cover her head, have her also cut her hair off; however, if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, have her cover her head.
 
7 For a man should not have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.
 
8 For man does not originate from woman, but woman from man;
 
9 for indeed man was not created for the woman’s sake, but woman for the man’s sake.
 
10 Therefore the woman should have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels.
 
11 However, in the Lord, neither is woman independent of man, nor is man independent of woman.
 
12 For as the woman originated from the man, so also the man has his birth through the woman; and all things originate from God.
 
13 Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered?
 
14 Does even nature itself not teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him,
 
15 but if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her? For her hair is given to her as a covering.
 
16 But if anyone is inclined to be contentious, we have no such practice, nor have the churches of God.


Was this cultural? Verse 16 implies that it was not. “But if anyone is inclined to be contentious, we have no such practice, nor have the churches of God.” To be contentious is to be argumentative or controversial. I take that as, ‘If you want to argue about this, we as a church don’t even have any practices.’ Of course, the churches had their practices and their way of life.
 
When I thought about it, hadn’t it always been tradition among Christians and Jews for there to be gender distinction with clothing and hair length? Perhaps, modern times are not the right gauge to use to measure what is acceptable to God.
 
I knew this was something I didn’t fully understand. I wanted to know. Was it okay that I cut my hair? Is trimming fine? Should it be uncut? Should it be natural? What do I do or what do I stop doing? I struggled to understand, especially with so little actually spoken on this topic.
 
To be honest, I struggled with this topic for years. My hair is thin and the ends get damaged easily. I was introduced to the idea of uncut hair in 2011, but I didn’t have conviction on it or real understanding. I grew my hair as long as I could, but would continue to trim the ends once or twice a year to make it healthier. Until recently, I spent all those years interpreting this that hair needed to be long but did not need to be uncut. Still, every time I would trim my hair I felt so conflicted on whether or not it was okay. It always bothered me so much to ‘need’ to trim my hair. I’d get all worked up about it. Every time I would revisit the issue.
 
Searching the internet was little help. There are so many opinion pieces out there saying things every which way. One thing that I found works for me is to look at different ways people interpret something and test that against scripture for a process of elimination. I’ve heard a lot of things when this topic comes up. Let’s take a look at 10 of them (aside from people who will distract by switching the topic).
 
1 Ignore
This seems to be what most people do, but this is New Testament. So, I don’t see how it’s valid to say it’s not relevant.
 
2 Say it was cultural at the time, but give no explanation
This seemed to be the main reaction when I would bring up the topic with non-Apostolics. They said it was cultural, but they didn’t actually talk about the culture. They just thought that it wasn’t for us anymore.
 
3 Men having short hair and women having long hair is still relevant and something we need to follow.
This is in line with scripture.  
 
4 It’s disgraceful for a woman to have her head shaved or her hair cut off.
Cut off short or cut at all? I would think it’d be hard to notice a little trim. Cut short though is certainly noticeable. For countless years, this was a disgrace. In the Old Testament, when a woman was taken captive they shaved her head. Even today despite the insanity of modern times, even the secular world finds it shocking when a woman shaves her head. Even the world knows long hair is glorious and feminine. What about short hair though? Cultural norm or biblical disgrace? It’s hard to make such judgment calls when we do not desire to control or offend. We have to make these decisions for ourselves.
 
5 Women need to have uncut hair.
I think this is where the confusion comes in. Does it need to be uncut or does it need to not be cut off as in cut short? We’re going to get into that more.
 
6 Women need to have a covering. Wear a head covering at least when praying.
There are some conservative churches that teach this: Amish, conservative Mennonite, other Plain societies, Orthodox, historically Catholic churches did as well. It seems more common in the Eastern world than the Western. However, verse 15 says that if a woman has long hair her hair is given to her as a covering.
 
7 A covering is needed for women, but their long hair counts as a covering.
This is in line with scripture. That also begs the question: Should women with short hair wear a covering?
 
8 This is only about praying or prophesying uncovered.
While that does technically fit, what about where it says long hair is a woman’s glory? Shouldn’t we always be ready to pray? I wouldn’t want to have to go get a head-covering to pray with if I can have a covering with me always.
 
9 This is about authority in the household. The man is the head of woman, and she should have a symbol of authority on her head.
I don’t know that I understand how this is a symbol of authority, but the scriptures are there. Still, how is saying this an excuse to not be obedient to this? There are some that say this is just for wives. I can see where they get that from verse 3, but the words chosen are men and women. It doesn’t say wives only. Besides, shouldn’t unmarried women be prepared to get married and look like a wife?
 
10 These verses are about shrine prostitutes. Shaved heads were for prostitutes. This was an issue in Corinth. The instruction is to not look like them.
I find this response particularly interesting. I’ve heard many people try to dispute women having uncut hair or requiring long hair by saying that these verses were about prostitutes. Let’s get into this one. At that time this was written to the Corinthians, there were pagan temple prostitutes that were distinguished by their shaved heads. It’s reported that some cultures also shaved a woman’s head as a punishment for adultery. Women of God were not to look like these women living a life of sexual sin. And when these prostitutes and pagans would come to believe in Jesus and come into the church, it was quick to see they were a convert because of their hair. So, they were instructed to wear a covering over their hair because being shorned was disgraceful. However, for the women with long hair no covering was needed because their long hair was given to them as a covering. And people use this as a reason to not have distinction. Wouldn’t that mean that the women of God had long hair? Wouldn’t that mean that the people following Jesus looked different than the pagans? They lived different. They looked different. I can’t help but wonder how this relates to modern times. When we’re studying the history of the church, it’s easy to think of things as way back then. Isn’t it the same thing now? Christians often live and look different than non-Christians. How often can you immediately recognize a new member to the church? Why? Because they look like the world, right? Back then the prostitutes were distinguished by their shaved heads. Think about it today. If someone comes into church looking like a prostitute looks in modern times, you know that they are a visitor or a new convert (and it’s great that they are there!). What happens? Gradually, their looks change along with their inner transformation. Now what would you think if one of those women who resembled a person living a life of sexual sin started prophesying? Most would hesitate to listen to someone who looked like that. If we live for the Lord and walk a lifestyle of holiness, we look different than those walking a lifestyle of sin. You can look right and live wrong, but if you live right and you look like you don’t how does that affect your witness? Should a person dressed disgracefully be leading the prayer group? No. (It’s not that they can’t have a heart for God, but they haven’t matured enough to lead if they are lacking in the basic fruits of holiness.) The principle behind this is not that different. We are called to be set apart. Those who follow Jesus should not dress or put together their appearance in a way that resembles those who live a life of sexual immorality.
 
Another thing I learned that goes along with this is in the Jewish Encyclopedia 6th edition on page 158 it says “Among women long hair is extolled as a mark of beauty (Cant. iv. 1, vii 6). A woman’s hair was never cut except as a sign of deep mourning or of degradation (Jer. vii. 29; comp. Deut. xxi. 12).” Given this history, it appears that uncut hair would have been the norm in the early church. Aren’t we continuing the faith and practices of the early church?
 
I’ve heard quite a few things over the years when this topic has come up. Many ignore or say it’s not relevant in our culture. Let me ask you this. Is our culture living for God right now? Are we a holy nation? A righteous people? Abstaining from sin and impurity? No. Should current culture be our measuring stick for what’s acceptable to God? No.
 
Let’s test these different interpretations. What fits scripture?
  • It’s New Testament. It’s relevant for us. It is not cultural for the times. It’s not just the church in Corinth. If anyone wants to be argumentative about it, the churches of God have no other practice (verse 16).
  • Men should have short hair and women should have long hair (verses 14-15, 6).
  • It is a dishonor for a man to have long hair (verse 14).
  • Long hair is a glory for a woman (verse 15).
  • A woman’s long hair is a covering to her (verse 15).
  • It is a disgrace for a woman to be praying or prophesying when she is shorn or shaven (verse 6).
 
To cut off short or cut at all? That is the thing that I struggled with understanding. I will confess it was 11 years into being Apostolic before I really understood this. It wasn’t until researching for this blog that I learned more of the history and the language and finally felt like I had understanding. I’m being transparent here because this blog is about sharing my journey in coming to understand this aspect of the faith lifestyle. I don’t profess to be a professional minister. I simply share my faith and invite people to hear my faith journey.

One thing that was a hangup for me was in my family we differentiate between cutting and trimming. Are you going to get your hair cut or just trim it? It's treated as different things. I brought that language difference from the world into my interpretation of scripture. I didn't think trimming was really cutting your hair.
 
Bible translations were a big factor in my confusion. Older translations including King James Version and the American Standard Version say “shaven” in verse 5 and “shorn or shaven” in verse 6. However, modern English translations talk about it being cut off or shaved.
 
King James Version
But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
 
American Standard Version
But every woman praying or prophesying with her head unveiled dishonoreth her head; for it is one and the same thing as if she were shaven. For if a woman is not veiled, let her also be shorn: but if it is a shame to a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be veiled.
 
New American Standard Version
But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying disgraces her head, for it is one and the same as the woman whose head is shaved. For if a woman does not cover her head, have her also cut her hair off; however, if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, have her cover her head.
 
NET
But any woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered disgraces her head, for it is one and the same thing as having a shaved head. For if a woman will not cover her head, she should cut off her hair. But if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, she should cover her head.
 
ESV
but every wife who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head, since it is the same as if her head were shaven. For if a wife will not cover her head, then she should cut her hair short. But since it is disgraceful for a wife to cut off her hair or shave her head, let her cover her head.
 
NIV
But every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head—it is the same as having her head shaved. For if a woman does not cover her head, she might as well have her hair cut off; but if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, then she should cover her head.
 
At this point, I would get confused with what translation is accurate. All the modern English ones I look at say to cut off. And I only pay attention to translations that are focused on literal translation. I avoid anything paraphrased or loosely phrase for phrase. Yet the older translations say shorn.
 
I am definitely a modern English gal. All these years I’ve been reading not to “cut off” our hair, and I had an image in my head of short hair that had been chopped. Perhaps, my mistake in that was the image that came to mind was an assumption more than an interpretation. The only way to cut hair is to cut some off. Cutting off an inch at the ‘dead ends’ is still cutting off.
 
Am I understanding what it means to be shorn? Some dictionaries list this as to cut short or nearly shave. Others define it simply as to cut. Common context is to compare is to shearing a sheep and cutting their hair short (taking off their covering). Is that an accurate comparison? How was the word used when these translations were written? To get to the bottom of a question when I feel bible translations are confusing, I go straight to the original. An interlinear bible is a great study tool. In the interlinear bible, it translates it to English as “disgraceful to a woman to be shorn or to be shaven let her cover her head”. In verse 6 when it says “to be shorn”, the Greek word is “keirasthai”. The listed Strong’s concordance 2751 lists “Keiro” as a verb defined as “to shear” with usage “I shear, cut the hair of”.
 
Merriam Webster defines shear as
Transitive verb
1a: to cut off the hair from
1b: to cut or clip from someone or something
1d: to cut or trim with shears or a similar instrument
 
Interestingly, before scissors were called scissors they were called shears.
 
We could certainly split hairs on the controversy over whether it is supposed to be uncut or simply be long. We could talk about the what ifs. What if somebody’s hair hits the floor? What if somebody’s hair won’t grow? What if they have health issues that make their hair fall out? What if their hair is thin? What if the ends are damaged? What if it doesn’t look as good as it would if you cut it?
 
Okay. Those are valid questions. Do they matter though? You need to refine your idea of beauty. The world convinces you that women need a fresh cut, a new color, a bold look. They train you to think that your hair must not have split ends (even though the ends of hair will split no matter what). A chopped straight across is beauty agenda is not the same thing as godly beauty. Natural hair is beautiful. Long hair is beautiful. There is a feminine elegance that takes years of dedication to achieve. Uncut hair has a different kind of beauty to it.
 
We each have to decide for ourselves how we interpret this and what we will follow. As for me, I think it’s still an instruction for us. If the bible says we aren’t to be shorned and shorn means to shear and shear means to cut, should we cut it? I won’t argue that it could mean to cut short. I agree that cutting short is disobedient to this scripture. Nevertheless, to shear technically means to cut (period) regardless of the context we usually use it in. So, I don’t want to. I want long hair. I want glorious hair. I want the covering. I want to be obedient to scripture the best I understand it. I interpret this as I, as a woman professing holiness, need to have uncut hair and however long it grows is up to the Lord.
 
 
And that is why Apostolic Pentecostal women do not cut their hair.
 
This is something that as women we each have to figure out what it means and what we are going to do about how we interpret it. I share this blog because it was a hard topic for me, and I know there are women searching the internet for this topic as I was for so many years. I invite you to consider these things and take time to think on it, pray about it, and genuinely seek the Lord on the matter. We all take time to grow. I feel like it’s unfortunate that it took me 11 years to understand what could have taken a day if someone had taken the time to really explain this matter. I hope this blog is enough to teach you that you don’t spend a decade feeling conflicted or going back and forth.
 
If you are a seasoned saint in the faith, I nudge you to bring up the topic with the newer in Christ and open a discussion on these scriptures.
 
If you have any questions, you are welcome to comment on the blog. Questions are always welcome; answers are always honest.


As for me

After studying this scripture and the historical context behind it, I interpret it that women are to have uncut hair. That is still relevant for us. I no longer cut my hair, trim it, take scissors to it in any way, or do anything to try to get rid of the ends as they naturally are. I leave my hair natural. I also don't dye it or do anything to alter its natural state such as getting perms.

I remember being afraid to make the commitment to not cut it. What if it gets really bad? What if the ends are damaged so badly people say something about it? What if people think natural hair looks bad? What if it thins out even more? What if? I obeyed anyway. After I made that commitment to obey this scripture, the worries went away. My hair has some split ends. I'm okay with that. It doesn't bother me. I realized one day that it reflects nature in other ways. I thought of how weird it would look if we chopped a willow tree so all their beautiful willows were straight across and not different lengths. Sometimes the way the "split ends" branch out reminds me of tree roots. God doesn't want us chopping off our hair to fit the world's idea of beauty. He doesn't want us with wild hair that makes us look rebellious against him. We are called to be set apart for holiness. I came to a point that I felt complete peace in obedience about my hair being uncut. I never had peace about it when I spent a decade tossing and turning over this issue trying to figure it out. In hindsight, that hesitation was a nudge to study this scripture and understand it better.

If you are new to uncut hair, talk to other ladies in your church about hair care. Many of us use oils or leave-in conditioner on our ends to keep them moisturized and prevent damage. You can also seek advice on styling if you've never had longer hair before. There are several Facebook groups for Apostolic Pentecostal hair.

Study these scriptures and pray on the matter.

Resources:
 
www.biblegateway.com to look at different scriptures
 
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/1_corinthians/11.htm for the interlinear of 1 Corinthians 11
 
https://biblehub.com/greek/keirasthai_2751.htm The Greek word for “to be shorn”
 
https://biblehub.com/greek/2751.htm Strong’s concordance for shorn
 
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/shear Webster’s definition of shear
 
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/singular-of-scissors Scissors used to be called shears
 
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/97/Jewish_Encyclopedia_Volume_6.pdf Jewish encyclopedia referencing women’s uncut hair on page 158 (169 in the PDF)
 
53 Comments
Lauren Chandler
24/1/2023 22:16:09

Thank you so much for sharing this post. I was in my home church (an apostolic Pentecostal church) as a child, and I never really got back in until after my first year of college. After about a year of striving to be obedient to the Lord and his word, I receive the Holy Ghost (about 7 months ago)! I wanted to say that I also went through the same process of wanting to take care of your hair because a woman’s hair is her glory! I would see internet stuff about how if you trim your hair, it would help it grow, which sounded great to me, because I felt the need to make “catch up” with other women (which was wrong to compare and my hair was already somewhat short at the time). But every time I would trim my hair I would STRUGGLE.. I didn’t realize it at the time, but what I was feeling was conviction. When doing some research I came across a video that pointed out the translation to mean “uncut.” I felt that was the Lord confirming me that I wasn’t supposed to cut my hair.

I really enjoyed your post because it was easy to read and follow along with! I haven’t been able to find information about “uncut” hair since that video until this post and I will definitely be saving it! I always pray over my hair and encourage others to do so too! There is power in prayer in Jesus name :)

Reply
Carol ONeill
6/9/2024 23:28:13

I believe not cutting hair was meant for the times Christ was on earth! Not met for today's world! Old testament for old times! Modern world has many changes Churches have changed many things because old ideas are no longer logical in the world.

Reply
Savi Gopal
8/9/2024 20:31:22

Jesus Christ the same yesterday, today and forever. He never changes and His Word never changes. In fact, the Book
Of Corinthians was written during the New Testament era and it was written for the New Testament Church.

Matthew 24:35 KJV
Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.


Kristen M. Dugas link
28/8/2023 14:54:00

Hi Leanna,
My personal belief is that Paul is responding to a faction of men who want women to be veiled while praying or prophesying. I believe that Paul is repeating the words of the men in vv.4-6. The men are making a literal head argument saying, "Every woman who has her head unveiled while praying or prophesying disgraces her [own] head...." This is why Paul gives his model (v.3) with the figurative meaning of "head" (which means "source/origin"). So, in verse 7, Paul starts his rebuttal to the men to explain why women are not to be veiled. Paul says, "For a man indeed ought not to veil his head (see v.3), since He (Christ) is the image and glory of God, but the woman is the glory of man." So, I believe that Paul is telling the men that just as a man ought not to veil his head (Christ), since He is the image and glory of God, so also the man ought not to veil the woman since she is his glory. The Bible tells us that Jesus Christ is the image and glory of God (2 Cor. 4:4, Col. 1:15, John 1:14, Heb. 1:3, Phil. 2:5-6, Rev. 21:23). Male and female are created IN the image of God, but only Jesus Christ IS the very image of God, because He is the Word made flesh.

Also, I believe the proper translation of vv.14-15 is as follows:

For not even nature itself teaches you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him, but if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her because the long hair has been given instead of a covering. (Note: The ISV has a similar translation.) So, Paul is saying that it is not a dishonor for a man (e.g., Samson, Samuel) to have long hair because God has allowed it through nature. He is also saying that it is not a disgrace for women to cut their hair because many women have unmanageable hair (frizzy, thin, etc.).

Also, many scholars have acknowledged that Paul quotes throughout his letter to the Corinthians. Some other verses that scholars believe are quoted are 1 Corinthians 6:12a, 6:12b, 6:13, 7:1, 8:1, 8:8, 10:23a, 10:23b, 14:22, 14:34-35. Therefore, it would be odd in this passage if Paul did not include the content of the quote.

Anyway, this is just what I believe. Thanks for allowing me to share.

Reply
Leanna Mae link
28/8/2023 21:16:51

Hi, Kristen. I have not heard this interpretation before. The context of this scripture is about authority. With your interpretation, what authority is a woman having as a sign on her head if she cuts off her hair? (verse 10).

Verse 15 refers to a woman's hair as her covering. In verse 5 it says an uncovered woman disgraces her head. If we don't need any kind of covering, how do you interpret these verses?

It's so important that we use accurate translations. I often use an interlinear bible, especially if I am studying something I am going to teach. James 3:1 tells us those who teach will be judged more strictly. You stated that you believe the proper translation of verse 14 and 15 is "For not even nature itself". What sources are you using to determine the accuracy of the bible translations you use? If you look at an interlinear bible, remember the sentence structure of Greek is different than English. The direct translation would read "Does not even nature itself teach you that a man, indeed if he has long hair, it is a dishonor to him?" The Greek word didaskei means to "cause to learn" or "to teach", and it is used throughout the bible in the context of teaching scripture. In verse 15 it goes on to say to quote directly translated from the interlinear here (arranged to English sentence structure) "However, a woman, if she has long hair it is glory to her. For the long hair, instead of a covering, is given to her." Where are you basing your interpretation of verse 15? Paul makes no mention of women being allowed to cut their hair because it is unmanageable, damaged, or thin.

Historically, Jewish women did not cut their hair and women in the early church did not cut their hair. What scriptures are you using to interpret that it's approved of to cut? Shorn means "to shear" and shear means "to cut" and scissors were historically called shears.

You say that "man ought not to veil the woman since she is his glory" but scripture says in verse 15 that her long hair is her glory and her covering. While verse 7 does say that the woman is the glory of man, we cannot ignore verse 15 clearly saying our long hair is our glory and our covering. The Greek word peribolaion means "a covering, a veil". Verse 5 says for a woman to pray or prophesy uncovered is disgracing her head.

So if the scriptures did allow for women to cut their hair, what is it that is the covering? And what is it that is the sign of authority on her head?

Interpreting it that it's not disgraceful for men to have long hair and it's okay for women to cut their hair is inaccurate, not based from the original manuscripts, contradicts the other scriptures here, and makes no sense with the message of us having authority on her head.

I implore you to consider the accuracy of your interpretations and chosen translations before you teach on these matters. Always reference the interlinear bible and study the historical context.

Reply
Jacob link
25/9/2024 06:38:00

Look Jesus Himself said that the lying pens of the scribes have mishandled and altered the Word of God. One minute God wants blood sacrifices from animals bur then layer who told you to bring me theses sacrifices. We allknow animal blood couldn't atone for our sins. In psalms it says "No man can by any means redeem his brother
Or give to God a ransom for him"⁠--
— Psalm 49:7. I'm just letting g u be aware of the fact the the scriptures were indeed manipulated......and if energy comes out yohead having short hair...man or woman, seems like sure fire way to lose energy, or take someone's energy like Delilah, or preventi g them from gaining strength and power by legally...Jewish law I mean....legally keeping a mam or womans hair short.

Remember with the Word of God a little here and a little there scripture upon scripture precept upon precept.


And I consider all knowledg we and wisdom known to me when times call for a teaching or learning moment......and I take translations and cultural background into consideration too and most often try to take it back to Greek and Hebrew translations.


My views not wrong. It may nor entirely correct but it's not wrong.


Of course what do I know.
Right?
Like there's no u or i in "we" or "me"but we can't make me without I. Ooops. Upper cade I. Turns out little i isn't i e of the popular vowels like eEaou or aye yo lol. Good read. Good read I do say.

One question. Jokingly.
Why so serious.

Just kidding Life and death and eternity and all I know I know .....take your message Jake lol


Good day to u. And a great night as well.

Carol ONeill
6/9/2024 23:30:31

I agree totally on what the writer says,!

Reply
Jacob link
25/9/2024 05:59:16

First of all thank you taking on the teacher role even if I only caught this one study you taught me quite a bit about your topic and your words helped my mind stay on topic instead of wandering off w thoughts that I shouldn't allow myself to get carried off by. Thank you for your patience.

To Kristen....I dug your words and only have one or two...maybe three things to remind us all of.... 1. If your hair wasn't so important then why does God have everyone of them counted. 2.Gravity one of those Laws with certain loop holes.....like it'll hold everything down all while letting most energy flow upward and onward, so it makes sense to have long hair for transmitting and controlling your energy because...I'm pretty sure our energy goes from the soles of our feet to the tops of our heads and if lifted hands out of the palms and fingers of our hands. We don't walk w our hands up constantly but ever since w could walk we been holding our heads up while gravity tries to make us put our head down while at all times energy is leaving our head...whether it's up, down, cocked, or crooked....because your head is where the world's strongest chemical factory is located and the Hchemicals that a human brain can create can manifest Madd Madd amounts of power and electricity and chi...........so to me personally it doesn't seem wise to cut of the parts of your body that cover and protect and grow directly off the housing unit for the smartest part of most people's body....their head. And if hair isn't so righteously wicked enough why is it that cutting your hair during certain stages of the moon effects how long your hair will grow back. Is it because the moon effects silver, like all the silver that's in all ocean water that directly contributes to the tides and oceanographic changes and disturbances. The Human body contains silver lol is the some mysteriously powerfully connection between your hair and the moon. Paul had the tendency of being a genius to some and quit perplexing to others. I mean paul says that he is a free man and a prisoner of Christ and Paul says tho I am a free man in Christ I make myself to man as to Save some... but isn't it Whoever the Son sets free is free Indeed.

Look the hair thing is basically alien anyways why would the be a need to number every hair on your head unless each hair can be held accountable for one thing or another and doesn't it seem like at times your hair acts like it has a mind of its own...u want it to lay flat it stands up, you want it to wave and it curls up on you you want it spiked str8 up and it freaking rolls off the back of yo head....

My best advice is stick to those who knew Jesus best walked, lived with, and aye with Him like Mark, Thomas,Matthew, Phillip, James and James and John the sons of thunder and Mary from Magdalena or even judas iscariot



People discredit judas but he didn't do anything wrong. Each time he sinned against Jesus.. Satan entered i to him and possessed him. That's why judas felt so guilty because he couldn't believe what he had done so he attempted to hang himself. Tried to commit suicide but God knew the truth and wouldn't let him commit suicide....cause the rope or the branch broke and his body fell to the ground hitting some rocks w enough force thst his guts burst out. And check this....The romans couldn't pick Jesus out of a line up....he looked like every other Hebrew man. K8nda racist but true..the romans couldn't identify Him on the spot.. how else would of he been arrested if it wasn't orchestrated by Jesus Himself..i mean jesus orchestrating the devils work..
and judas was the moneyholder...the coin collector and Jesus was walking around with a large chunk of coin most of the time....why in the world would a judas, a disciple, friend, and student of Jesus...betray jesus for 40 pieces of silver when he carried all the money with him.

Im just saying when it comes to the people I trust the most about the information i receive about Christ Jesus my LORD Who sealed me w His Holy Spirit
I tend to believe those who knew Him best over those who say there was a bright light and I heard the Lords voice and says he saw the LORD but later says he did see him....or take facts from a guy who condemned to an island that to this day naturally grows magic mushrooms in abundance due to such righteous atmospheric conditions who starts of his testimony by saying he was told by angel...one of God's angels. Not the angel of the LORD or even Gabriel who delivered messages as a job description...nope just an angel of God, the God Who Just Forsook His only Begotten son, left him for dead, cursed, and nailed to a tree where he eventual didn't die....He gave up the Ghost......He was so torn and broken that God incarnate....godman, chose to give up The Ghost because if He knew if He didn't give up they could take it from Him and He knew that if chose to be the end of Roman rule warrior messiah then at that point in time He would had to come and D

Reply
Kristen M. Dugas link
29/8/2023 23:01:11

Hi Leanna,
There are many scholars who believe that "kephale/head," used figuratively, means "source/origin," not "leader/authority." I agree with the scholars who say this. Here's why. God the Father is completely righteous, holy, and sinless. Jesus Christ is completely righteous, holy, and sinless. Man is completely unrighteous, unholy, and sinful. So, if Christ submits to God, then He submits to One who is righteous, holy, and sinless. If men submit to Christ, then they submit to One who is righteous, holy, and sinless. If women submit to men, then they submit to one who is unrighteous, unholy, and sinful. Even the apostle Paul struggled with sin after he gave his life to Christ (Rom. 7:19). This sin nature is why Christ always taught that believers are to do the will of His Father who is in heaven.

As for vv. 14-15, I believe the ISV has the correct translation for two reasons. First, they leave this sentence in statement (not question) form. And secondly, they omit the pronoun "aute" (to her) as it is not found in a number of ancient Greek manuscripts. The ISV translation is as follows:

14"Nature itself teaches you neither that it is disgraceful for a man to have long hair 15nor that hair is a woman's glory, for hair is given as a substitute for coverings."

The original Greek did not have punctuation. And the first word in the sentence is "oude" which means "neither, nor, not even, not." The word "does" is added because the translators are putting it into question form. Also, here is what Michael Marlowe has to say on his website titled "The Woman's Headcovering." He states, "In verse 15 there is some reason to think that the pronoun aute "to her" at the end of the verse is not original. It is omitted by Papyrus 46, D, F, G, and also by the majority of later Greek manuscripts." So, I do believe that the ISV has the most accurate translation of vv. 14-15 that I have seen.

Also, in verse 10, the words "a symbol of" are not in the original Greek. There is an excellent article titled "Worst NT Translations Relating to Women" by Andrew Bartlett on christianitytoday.com if you would like to read it. He explains the words 'sign of' or 'symbol of' reverses the meaning of the expression 'have authority.'" He also says in modern English we can render verse 10 as, 'Because of this a woman ought to have authority [Greek exousia] over [Greek epi] her head.'"



Reply
Leanna Mae link
30/8/2023 18:42:06

So, in your gospel, there is no obedience, no submission, no authority, no patriarchy, no biblical family structure, no gender distinction, and no holiness for Christ-followers? It sounds like you will twist and deny any scripture to make it please your flesh. You've allowed yourself to become deceived because you refuse to be obedient to the word of God.

This is the problem with feminism.You can't follow both. Either your faith will destroy feminism or feminism will destroy your faith. The patriarchy is God's design for the family.

On your website, you confess that reading the bible went against your beliefs. Where did you get those beliefs from that the bible went against? Christians should be getting their beliefs from the bible, not from their personal opinions and how they feel. It is essential to the Christian faith to believe that the bible is the accurate word of God and is still for us to follow. It's unfortunate that you have chosen to take on the position of teaching (by writing a book) without realizing you've shredded the actual word of God to satisfy your feminism and feel peace in your disobedient nature. James 3:1 says those of us who teach will receive greater judgment. I encourage you to examine the source of your beliefs and what you choose to follow. Bowing out by saying you are not a professional writer or these are just your personal beliefs will not change the fact that you have chosen to be a voice for twisting the bible. Clear your mind of the feminism, and you may begin to see clearly. Obedience and submission are biblical. God designed the patriarchy, and it is beautiful.

It's truly sad to see someone who claims to be Christian be so deceived that they've convinced themselves man mistranslated the bible on purpose to oppress women (as stated on your website), any words you don't like aren't supposed to be there, and some scholars that have no merit have enlightened you that everything means the opposite of what it says to fit in with modern culture and satisfy the flesh's desire to live for self.

Your views are the most I have ever seen feminism twist the bible. I pray that the devil lose his stronghold over you to deceive you, and that women you reach with your book would know the Word well enough to know when it's twisted. Feminism is not of God.

Reply
Valerie S
24/9/2023 22:24:59

Thank you so much for this info. Good stuff!! I need to read the Bible as it stands… KJV.. if I don’t know what “shorn” means, I look it up in the dictionary. But of course, it’s our sin nature that has us dig for the words we want the Bible to say. That’s why there are so many doctrines. If we take a step back and really consider the Bible as a whole... If you are doing what the majority (world) is doing then you should reconsider what you’re doing. It doesn’t seem like God has ever chosen the majority. (Please correct me if I’m wrong.) All of these well studied Pharisees and Sadducees just dug and dug into the Word, and yet they missed Him. He used the simplest ways to explain himself, His kingdom, and what we need to do if we want to follow Him. (parables..) As much as I would love to cut this lion’s mane, He simply told me not to. Anyway, I’m not a teacher. I’m just someone working out my own salvation.

Reply
M Rivera
8/9/2024 06:59:52

“Not a teacher” and yet so eloquently put, “they dug and dug into the word, and yet they missed Him”.

Reply
Unothando Yalezo
18/7/2025 19:04:10

How ironic that you mention a lions mane when it's only male lion who grow manes. I don't really know what to make of this discussion because there are alot of things mentioned by the writer that make sense and even the feminist women's argument had points that made sense,because I've always asked myself what paul meant by "does not nature itself......"I've done research on it and one of the preachers pointed out that nature kind of teaches the opposite. If we look at male animals such as lions or birds the males have more pronounced displays.eg. lions have manes, cocks have more feathers ,orangutans have more and longer hair than females. And another thing I used to think about is samson had long hair and It was an instruction from God.I know that God can do anything and his ways are higher than our ways,but I also feel like this verse might be misinterpreted and it honestly kind of makes sense in the way the ISV Puts it.But I don't know.

Reply
Donna Jones
8/10/2023 14:17:51

I used to look at other women also and I wanted my hair to touch the floor as I feel the same way about my head being covered. I thought by trimming the ends was ok as it would make my hair longer. I never thought about it the way you described using scripture. Thank you for the insight. I will love and appreciate what God has given me and not compare myself with others. Thank you and God bless you! I am so thankful he saved my soul.

Reply
Tonya Martin
17/10/2023 10:14:43

I truly agree with you. My daughter and i have been discussing this just within the last few days. Seeing alot of women claiming to be used by God but they don't look any different the world. I am apostolic pentecostal. Born and raised. Minus a few years away from the church. But I've always believed that we need to look differently than the world. People always complement my hair. Asking what I use. Stating its so shiny and healthy. I don't cut my hair. It is my glory. With that the power of the holyghost shows through my hair. It is very important for the distinguishing of the sexes as well. There is power and authority in the long hair. As well as distinguishing we are people of God. We stand out. God says to be holy for I am holy. I believe that's also aligning with the way we dress as well. It all goes together. He wants us to be different. To be a light to this lost and dying world. They need something different than what they have. How will they know if they don't see a difference. I will share a story told to me years ago. A missionary lady and her husband were from our church. She was in the missionary field for many years.. she was raised in the truth but always trimmed her hair. She stated that she could never really get where she wanted to in the spirit. She asked God one day "why is it i can't break into another level in the spirit. GOD spoke back to her, stop cutting your hair." She said she was shocked that she never saw it before. So it is a form of submission to God and honoring his wishes. We reach new heights in the kingdom, with authority and power.. For those that question it or think its not necessary,
just think about pleasing your husband. You would want to make him happy and proud. How much more would you want God our heavenly father,our husband. I certainly do. Thanks for this blog. It was very refreshing to see someone that has the same view as we do.

Reply
Jacob link
25/9/2024 09:03:24

I just wanna take a moment to address the whole they claim to be used by God but don't look no different from the world. Who are you to judge the
apprarance of anyone. The wise judge not by what they appear to dre or hear as God does the judge the intent of the heart of outwardly appearances. You cannot say someone is not gl godly because their appearance says otherwise. You do realize we are at war and God does place certain lower and higher class individuals and/or groups and ororganization I strategic positions for His war campaign where He uses to certain soldiers trained with specific skill sets to directly fight against powers, principalities, and spiritual forces in this dark world. Some of these people are known or ha e been heard of and thers are not and believe it or not some of God's people are now under and still go undercover so as to snatch as many from the flames as possible from the ranks of the oppositions troops.
At conversion the transformation s obvious to everyone that you a Jesus freak at first when your baptized at 17. But 25, 35, 40 years of studying the Bible and everything that even kinda pertains to Truth andJesus your look isn't gna be the same as it was when you was 17 after being in.Constant daily warfare with the enemy and his peeps 30 plus years day in a d day out constantly bei g attacked by both sides cause the true follower of Christ knowstheres no pickina sides you only have TheWay. Though there is a way through the wilderness a "Highway" to the LORD but it's the long way that usually only the cursed would travel... but there's blessings on that highway through the wilderness..seen em w my own two eyes. Look...Jesus may be the same yesterday, today, and forever but people are not. People change. That's why most people don't trust other people....because people change.
We do stick our because the same God that said be holy for IAN holy also said don't be overly righteous and do t be overly wicked, it's good to grasp one without letting go if the other. The man if God comes forth with both. He is able to be righteously wicked.

Here's the quote.
Do not be excessively righteous and do not be overly wise. Why should you ruin yourself? Do not be excessively wicked and do not be a fool. Why should you die before your time? It is good that you grasp one thing and also not let go of the other; for the one who fears God comes forth with both of them.
— Ecclesiastes 7:16-18


I'm not your enemy and I'm no accuser that jobs taken . I AM just a Witness to Truth that has been revealed to me. God bless u all and peace to u a d urs

Reply
Jean
9/5/2024 08:18:45

Hi,
Thank you so much for taking the time to write this blog.
I have a question, is it ok to tie up our haur or even have it half up, or should it be out all the time?
Thanks!

Reply
Leanna Mae link
13/5/2024 21:10:47

Hi, Jean. It's okay to put your hair up. Longer hair often needs to be styled to prevent tangles especially if it's windy. Your hair is your glory, but you don't have to leave it down. Even with it being in a bun, uncut hair is still your crowning glory and is in obedience to the scriptures.

Reply
Sonnie
4/3/2025 15:48:11

so you are saying a woman who cuts or clips hair does not cover a woman's head , the same has you having it tied up on your head and your neck and ears showing unless it's cut in the image of a man, it's still covers your head the whole thing about not cutting it is it's our glory I cut my hair I pray and read the bible and am blessed with the Holy Ghost and speak in tongues been cutting my hair for years there are many ways for a woman to cover her hair when she prays or witnesses Bonnets hats , scarfs nets veils

Schledia Anderson
10/2/2025 21:51:10

I have some Mennonite friends, and they told me that the Mennonite women all keep their hair up and cover their hair with an actual covering because a woman's hair is her glory, so only her husband is allowed to see her in all her glory.
I don't necessarily believe that, but I think it is a beautiful belief!

Reply
Savi Gopal
4/6/2024 23:00:07

Praise Jesus! I’ve had long uncut hair since I was in church back in 1995. Have heard great teachings and preachings on the power of the uncut hair because of the angels. But when my 1st marriage failed, I rebelled and cut my crowning glory. I was robbed two days later. I knew it was because the protection was removed because of my disobedience to God’s Word. It’s been a struggle since, I’ve colored my hair, time and time again and all the harsh chemical I put on my hair did not allow my hair to grow past my hips without my hair being brittle and having split ends. I would trim my hair, then cut it, then 2 months later to cover the roots, I’d color again. It was a vicious cycle. Each time I took the shears to my hair, I’d have such a strong conviction that I’m cutting the glory and God given covering/protection but because my hair needed to be trimmed, I’d do it and then I’d repent and ask God to help me. This went on for years. I knew I had to break the cycle so I said to myself that I was to be used if God and have protection over me and my family, I must obey God’s Word concerning my hair. I went to the store and bought a demi permanent hair color (less damaging) closest to my natural color (dark brown) and only wash my hair twice a week. I started incorporating leave in conditioner after washing my hair and oils for my ends. To my surprise since I’ve stopped coloring my hair it is healthy and growing with no visible split ends. I also massage my scalp often. I asked God to help me in this journey because I love Him and want to obey Him. Some people struggle with all sorts of addictions, but for me it was my addiction to coloring my hair and ruining it but not anymore, I’ve got my breakthrough! Thank you Jesus. Acts 2:38/Acts 4:12

Reply
Amanda Woodall
7/7/2024 19:41:11

Hi Leanna!

What about those who have dyed their hair, and are looking to start the journey of their natural hair? Would cutting the dye off still be the same since the dye is technically unnatural?

Thanks!

Reply
Leanna Mae link
7/7/2024 22:19:04

Hi, Amanda :) Good question! I wouldn't cut the hair even if it's dyed because it is the coloring that is unnatural, not the hair itself. I do think it's okay to dye hair back to the natural color when we are beginning our journey of natural hair. I know it can be a hard transition. I used to dye my hair and had some wild colors back in the day (cherry red, purple, blue). It can be tempting to cut off all that old and start fresh, but now that I have understanding of the scriptures on not shorning our hair as women I wouldn't take scissors to it.

Reply
Suzanne
13/8/2024 19:28:10

I just want to say thank you for your article and your honesty, and helping others to understand

Reply
Rachel link
14/8/2024 23:30:15

Thank you for sharing this! I'm from an Apostolic pentecostal church in an Asian city and this post really helped back my understanding in this area, I've kept uncut hair for 19 years now, but wanted to really understand the more specific parts on trimming - it helped that you went into detail on that and drew up word studies to get down to it's specific definition :-). I do it in faith, but it just helps so much more when you know exactly why you do what you do because the Word is specific about it.

Reply
Robin
21/8/2024 07:54:04

10 Therefore the woman should have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels.
Nothing is said about “because of the angels.” I just heard yesterday a talk on this topic stating it is important not to cut a woman hair as the angels can not differentiate between men & women when they cross the line into what is “biblical “ for the appropriate sex to be represented by their appearance. Interesting that was added “because of the angels.”

Reply
Savi Gopal
3/9/2024 19:08:30

Because of the angels simply means with and among the angels. Also for those women that have cut their, don’t let the devil condemn you, simply ask Jesus to forgive you for disobedience to His Word and don’t cut your hair again. This is what I’m doing personally, I lay my hands on my head and speak life into every follicle and speak strength into each weak and brittle hair, in Jesus name.

Reply
Elizabeth link
31/8/2024 04:59:01

After reading this post I am not going for trims anymore going to hairdressers for years trying g to grow my hair to wasit and being told your hair won't grow without trims which they cut of 5 or 3 inches every time my hair is still bra length being growing since 2016 now 2024 I don't colour or heat just shampoo and conditioner

Reply
Margaret link
7/9/2024 15:49:47

I sometimes feel that this was one of those times Paul was just being Paul. At times, he said that he was just expressing a personal opinion - and lent clarity to his argument. In this case, he went from making the angels look inept to making it sound like hair length had something to do with nature. Of course, this is not true. The men-folk in my family have more beautiful, longer hair than us women-folk, and they make many barber visits a year.
However, we need to keep our eyes trained on our maker. We receive the Lord as Savior and by John 1, male and female become "Sons of God". We are covered by the Blood of the Lamb before the Lord. It is He who gives us instruction, not Paul, not other humans for that matter. They will lead us astray concerning the Grace and Truth, by which the Messiah set us free.

Reply
Denise link
15/9/2024 11:36:22

I've recently felt lead to cut my hair. Which is now short. This was part of me wanting regrowth to connect with God in a healthy spirt. Not sure If I'm sharing this right. So, here is my question. I've recently been feeling like hair and connection to God is part of our journey. How do make sure the hair we grow is growing with a healthier mindset and spirt? Again I appogilze as this may not be the best way to word or ask.

Reply
Huntley Cowie
24/9/2024 17:59:08

Its so insightful to read all the comments,??? what about the majority of christian humanity who are black and have been blessed with short clearly hair.

Reply
Jea link
1/2/2025 06:44:05

God created hair, let it grow, no matter the hair type or colour of your skin, all irrevelant. It is all beautiful to The Lord for He created it.

Reply
Destiny
6/12/2024 18:39:46

I grew up under the teaching of uncut hair - it was your glory, your power with the angels. As I grew up, I slowly drifted away from the these teachings. I never cut my hair very short, it was always to my mid-back or longer. As I came back to God and the church, I would still cut my hair but every time I walked into the hair salon I would feel so much conviction! Literally so much conviction but I still ignored it. It wasn’t until my second pregnancy that the Lord began to deal with me about this issue in my dreams. I had dreams of my children being taken from me, held for ransom, locked in warehouses. The last dream I had was very scary and very real. I woke up in a panic and heard the audible voice of God saying “stop cutting your hair.” Since I have made this vow, I have not had any nightmares about my children’s safety. They are protected because I am obedient to God and his instruction.

Reply
Jea link
1/2/2025 05:23:41

I too, am no longer cutting my hair, I do not shave (whether it be my legs or underarms) as The Lord told me He created bodily hair, why do we want to get rid of what God made just because the world is doing it, and ridding of the things of God or alter that which He made? If the hair was not supposed to be there He would not have made it. Same with hair colouring, I no longer colour my hair as The Lord wants my hair natural, the way He made it, the exact colour He created me with. I do not style my hair, I leave it the texture and waves and curls that He created me to have, I do not change a thing, I leave it exactly as God has made. I do not wear makeup, not only is it of pagan origin but also it is not natural, that is not how I look. Why do we follow after the worlds standards of beauty when we are absolutely beautiful the way God has made us? All natural, as God made.

Reply
Leona
10/2/2025 22:31:25

Hello and thank you for this. I became a pentecostal woman in 2021 and until now I am still struggling with this as it leaves me confused as to why hair length matters. "Would it be so bad if I cut a few inches off?" "Scripture just says it needs to be long enough for a covering." Thoughts like that would flood me sometimes especially during hot days and my long hair annoys me. This helped me gain clarity in the subject. Thank you.

Reply
Nazarene
14/9/2025 17:24:38

My question is.... is this really going to take you to heaven? You not trimming your hair? We focus on such that we miss the point of God's Kingdom and saving souls.

Reply
Liz
28/3/2025 02:45:04

The passage in Corinthians is talking about authority. Not actual hair length. Women need to look like women and men need to look like men. I used to go to a pentecostal church but left for a myriad of reasons. What about Jewish women back then who took the Nazerite vow? The scripture also says if she cuts it, she might as well shave it all off; if it's a sin to cut it at all, why would God recommend more sin by shaving it off. The biggest problem about the hair thing in the pentecostal church is that it has become your idol. The holy magic hair, it is not your hair that does anything but God who does everything. It also says not to adorn yourselves ostentatiously, however we've seen the huge bows, jeweled brooches in hair, and glitter. How about instead of worrying about who's trimming their hair or not, we keep the greatest command: to love one another. There's supposed to be freedom in Christ.

Reply
Me
18/4/2025 03:45:08

I’m up in the middle of the night. I can’t sleep and my mind is back on my hair. It’s getting really long again and I’ve been so tempted to trim it. I’ve been Apostolic/Pentecostal my entire life , so I know better. Regardless, I’m just struggling. This blog helped me. Thank you for taking the time to research and write this. This was the encouragement I needed. God Bless.

Reply
Julie Johnson
25/5/2025 00:38:16

For me, when I think of altering my hair in any way, I simply feel grieved inside, like I would be betraying Jesus and breaking a very sacred, special bond of Love and commitment between me and Jesus. His heart is what matters most and it is only between Jesus and myself, I do it not to please people or organizations or church. Strictly between me and Jesus. Everyone has their own journey and walk with God and pray I never put people in a box of expectations and always leave the bossing up to Jesus over others. It's none of my business what others do with their hair.

Reply
Kaylee
26/5/2025 21:28:33

Hi, I go to a apostolic/pentecostal church, I didn't grow up in this church but I absolutely love it! My struggle is my hair length, lately my hair has been the longest it's ever been in my life, I have cried times because it's such a hassle... I never know what to do with it I just want to go back to wearing it down and not being a struggle. I feel bad that I feel this way, but It's been a constant struggle lately. Thanks for reading :)

Reply
Valerie Lockwood
24/7/2025 12:38:46

I believe that a women's long hair should look healthy and know one should ever push their convictions on anyone else. We should work out our own salvation!!

Reply
Leanna Mae link
24/7/2025 23:07:56

I would encourage you to consider what it means to make disciples. We are called to share the gospel. We are also all called to share the lifestyle of faith. Discussing scripture with one another is essential for growth. Your spirit of offense has led you to believe someone sharing their own personal story on their own website is "pushing their convictions" on other people. What does the bible say about sharing the faith? The instructions to go and make disciples are clear. It is also clear in Titus 2 that us older women are to instruct the younger women in godly ways. With the topic at hand, the bible doesn't say our hair needs to look healthy or chop it. It says it is our glory and those of us who are obedient to the Lord will follow the instruction to not shorn it.

Reply
Nazarene
14/9/2025 17:25:26

Amen

Reply
Liz
25/7/2025 17:54:00

This view is completely biased towards the upci religion. We have freedom in Christ, as long as you look and act like the woman God made you to be, you'll be fine. Religiousness does not equate to holiness. I've been around the pastors wives who look the part but had nasty, mean hearts. James 1:27 says that the only religion God accepts is that we look after orphans and widows in their time of need and not become corrupted by this world. While man looks on the outward appearance, God sees the heart 1 Sam 16:7. God used to require circumcision as a sign that His people belonged to him. In Romans 2:29 He requires circumcision of the heart. Obedience is not a hair issue, it's a heart issue. Hair length is a religious thing, not a salvation requirement. Hair length, at least in the UPCI because that's what I'm familiar with, has become an idol. Let's see who's holier by who has the longest hair 🙄. How about kindness and generosity. Nothing you wear or how long your hair is, is going to get you into heaven. Only the blood of Christ applied to your life can save you.

Reply
Leanna Mae link
28/7/2025 00:38:52

Hi, Liz. I'm actually not UPCI. I go to a WPF church, but myself am independent from denomination. UPCI is not a religion. It's a denomination. I am Apostolic Pentecostal. I can see you've had some bad experiences with Apostolic culture so often being focused on outer appearance.

Couple of things though.

Freedom in Christ is freedom from sin not freedom to sin. Disobeying the bible on purpose is sin.

Part of looking like the women God made us to be is by following gender distinction. That includes hair and clothing.

While religiousness and holiness could have a lot tangled in it, living holy is part of our religion as Christians.

James 1:27 is speaking of "pure and undefiled religion". It is not an exhaustive list of everything our religious practices should include.

God does look at the heart. The people we witness to and are to share the gospel with and those we disciple are looking at our outside. If it doesn't match the inside, there's a problem.

Obedience cannot solely be a heart issue. Obedience in the heart requires action. We cannot obey solely in our feelings. We must actually live according to the Word. Our feelings is the very thing we need to bring into subjection. The bible says we should take every thought captive (2 Corinthians 10:5).

I actually wrote a book on salvation called The Subject of Salvation. Stopping at salvation issues only is a dangerous path. Hair length is not a salvation issue. Disobedience is. We are not following Christ if we are rejecting his word and following our flesh's desire instead. If we reject the bible, we reject Him.

Hair has certainly become a matter of vanity and perhaps even an idol in Apostolic culture today both in length and hairstyle. It should not be a huge focus in our appearance. Holiness standards of appearance are just a portion of what holiness is all about, and it's not the main focus. I sense that you've got some anger towards Apostolics because of your experience with being judged. I would encourage you to not let that hinder your walk with God. If you are Christian, obey the scripture. It doesn't matter if a church you dislike does things that way and you'd rather rebel against that. It seems that you are dismissing this scripture out of your dislike for Apostolics. It doesn't seem like you are interested in examining the scriptures and rightly interpreting them so you can live by them. I encourage you to reflect on this matter and decide if you want to obey the bible (in general). If so, talk to God about hair length and cutting as well as what he wants for gender distinction among his people. You may not be seeing this matter clearly if you feel angry about it because you think a bible study is "biased" to a denomination. I examined the scriptures in this blog and different ways people interpret them. I did not present this as a teaching for a denomination's position. Refocus. How do you interpret the scripture?

Reply
Liz
28/7/2025 18:18:45

Where in scripture does it say that a woman cutting her hair is a sin? I have no anger toward the religion or people. I was born and raised in it and did every job in it, played piano, led worship service, Sunday school, youth group, cleaned, nursery, everything. You name the job, I did it. I know what goes on there. However the discussion is, "Is it a sin for a woman to cut her hair?". No it is not and the church should stop spreading that lie. The passage in Corinthians was referring to authority, in that time like our middle eastern cousins today, women didn't have very many rights or autonomy. If you read the old testament people, women included, we're doing some heinous things in the temples. The Corinthian church was in the middle of a controversy about the roles of men and women and the proper order of authority within the church. In the Corinthian society, women showed submission to their husbands by wearing a veil. It seems that some of the women in the church were discarding their veils, something that only pagan temple prostitutes or other rebellious women would do. For a woman to come to church without her veil would be dishonoring to her husband, as well as culturally confusing. By the same token, for a man to wear a veil or to somehow have his head covered during worship was not culturally acceptable in Corinth.

Paul appeals to biology to illustrate the appropriateness of following the cultural standards: women naturally have longer hair than men, and men are much more prone to baldness. That is, God created women with a “natural veil” and men with an “uncovered head.” If a woman spurns the mark of her submission (the veil), she may as well shave her head (verse 6). His point is that if the culture says a woman should not be bald (going without her natural covering), then why would she reject that same culture’s standard of wearing a veil (going without her cultural covering)?

For the man’s part, it is unnatural for him to have “long hair” (verse 14). His hair is naturally shorter (and thinner) than the woman’s. This corresponds to the Corinthian tradition of men not wearing a head covering during worship. Paul urges the church to conform to the generally held ideas of male and female appearance.

While hair length is not the main point of this passage of Scripture, we glean the following applications from it: 1) We should adhere to the culturally accepted indicators of gender. Men should look like men, and women should look like women. God is not interested in, nor does He accept, “unisex.” 2) We should not rebel against the culture just for the sake of rebelling, in the name of some sort of Christian “liberty.” It does matter how we present ourselves. 3) Women are to voluntarily place themselves under the authority of the male leadership of the church. 4) We should not reverse the God-ordained roles of men and women.

Our culture today does not use veils or head coverings to indicate submission to authority. The roles of men and women have not changed, but the way we symbolize those roles changes with the culture. Rather than establish legalistic standards of hair length, we must remember that the real issue is our heart condition, our individual response to the authority of God, His ordained order, and our choice to walk in submission to that authority. Men and women have different, God-ordained roles, and part of that difference is shown by their hair. A man’s hair should look masculine. A woman’s hair should look feminine. (gotquestions.org)

Under the new covenant the only law we have to adhere to is the law of love. Romans 13: 8-10 states, "8 Owe nothing to anyone—except for your obligation to love one another. If you love your neighbor, you will fulfill the requirements of God’s law. 9 For the commandments say, “You must not commit adultery. You must not murder. You must not steal. You must not covet.”[a] These—and other such commandments—are summed up in this one commandment: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”10 Love does no wrong to others, so love fulfills the requirements of God’s law." We are under the blood, it's not to say that we will be and are perfect. No, while we are here on Earth we will struggle with single daily. That's when we lean on Christ and His strength shows through in our weaknesses. I don't have to have hair dragging on the floor to know I am sealed by the blood of the lamb. I don't keep it very short because that's a personal preference, but it's not go in the toilet long lol. I want people to see Jesus not me and I think people in this age are waking up to that and can sense Him through me, at least I hope to be a good representative of Him, and God forgive me when I'm not. God Bless.

Leanna Mae link
31/7/2025 00:31:54

Matthew 22:36-40 (NASB)
“Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” And He said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ Upon these two commandments hang the whole Law and the Prophets.”

John 14:15 (NASB)
If you love Me, you will keep My commandments.

The one who has My commandments and keeps them is the one who loves Me; (John 14:21)

Loving God and loving our neighbors are the greatest commandments. However, truly loving God requires obeying his word. We can't dismiss scripture like it doesn't matter as long as we are loving towards our neighbors. We need to examine all of scripture, do our best to interpret it accurately, and live by it. Even when the focus as a Christian is on love, we still need to look at this scripture as women and try to figure out what it meant then and what it means for us today.

You and I interpreting this scripture differently does not mean I am "spreading lies" because I interpret it that we should not shorn our hair. It's not an idol of mine. It is something the Lord convicted me on and led me to study. Hence, this blog where I am sharing why I personally stopped cutting my hair after years of trimming it even after getting in the Apostolic church.

I don't think culture or current times should be what the church models gender distinction after. We are called to be set apart. We should be modeling our gender distinction after the example set by the early church. While I agree this topic of hair was being addressed in the letter to the Corinthians because of controversy and behavior in/near the temple, I don't think it becomes invalidated when culture changes. Historically, the women of the church had long hair. Culture today has drastically changed gender roles and what is considered normal. We are still set apart. Even the secular world can easily identify us as God's people when we wear skirts, keep our hair long, and choose not to adorn ourselves with cosmetics, jewelry, etc.

In regards to your previous comment, I agree adornment has become ostentatious. I dress simply, don't wear high heels, see no difference between broaches vs jewelry, etc. I do have another blog on adornment.

Reply
Liz
31/7/2025 17:30:35

Within the church, it has its own culture. 60 years ago, even 15 years ago, in the apostolic church it was wrong (sinful) for men to have beards. Within the last 5 years they now allow men to have facial hair. Also about 70-80 years ago it was a sin (within the church) to have a television. A very old,very sweet member of the church, would talk about as a girl she had to walk past a movie theater to get to school. She would cross the street and then walk past it. This is just to show the legalistic ideas that the church has. Now just about everyone has a TV in the form of a cell phone or actual TVs in their home. So you can see the cultural shifts within the church. The church never followed "worldly" culture, but it sure has its own.

Women used to not wear jewelry, bejeweled watches, and hair bling, but here we are now. The scriptures you stated, which I agree with wholeheartedly just further back up my claims.

In Matt 22:36-40 You want to focus on the word commandment. It's saying to focus on the commandments to love God and love your neighbor. Then right after that it says "Hang the whole law and the prophets." When we "hang" the rules we ignore them, do away with them.

In John it says keep my commandments. What are the commandments? To love God and love your neighbor. It's so simple that we can't bear the simplicity, we have to make it harder. Jesus knew we couldn't follow the law, that's why He died for us.

Galatians 2: 16-21
16 Yet we know that a person is made right with God by faith in Jesus Christ, not by obeying the law (legalism). And we have believed in Christ Jesus, so that we might be made right with God because of our faith in Christ, not because we have obeyed the law. For no one will ever be made right with God by obeying the law.”

17 But suppose we seek to be made right with God through faith in Christ and then we are found guilty because we have abandoned the law. Would that mean Christ has led us into sin? Absolutely not!
18 Rather, I am a sinner if I rebuild the old system of law I already tore down. 19 For when I tried to keep the law, it condemned me. So I died to the law—I stopped trying to meet all its requirements—so that I might live for God. 20 My old self has been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me. So I live in this earthly body by trusting in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. 21 I do not treat the grace of God as meaningless. For if keeping the law could make us right with God, then there was no need for Christ to die.

When trying to get the Bible in context we should read the entire chapter and the one before and after it, instead of just a single verse.

You've said your long hair is your personal preference and your conviction. It doesn't mean that it is or has to be everyone's in the faith. Romans 14 is very good at addressing this.

Romans 14 uses food because the Jews were integrating the gentiles to the faith and there were things the Jews would not eat because they were having a hard time letting go of the law. So they judged the gentiles about things they consumed.

However, Romans 14 is dealing with matters of conscience and disputable issues within the church. IE: men having beards, women cutting/styling their hair, other things that are personal preferences. There is no direct scripture that calls these things sin or any command other than men look like men and women look like women according to God. Would a woman with alopecia be committing sin. No of course not. By apostolic logic, if we strongly hold to the law/legalism, no acceptions, then yes she would be committing sin.

Romans 14: 10-19

10 So why do you condemn another believer[a]? Why do you look down on another believer? Remember, we will all stand before the judgment seat of God. 11 For the Scriptures say,

“‘As surely as I live,’ says the Lord,
‘every knee will bend to me,
and every tongue will declare allegiance to God.[b]’”

12 Yes, each of us will give a personal account to God. 13 So let’s stop condemning each other. Decide instead to live in such a way that you will not cause another believer to stumble and fall.

14 I know and am convinced on the authority of the Lord Jesus that no food, in and of itself, is wrong to eat. But if someone believes it is wrong, then for that person it is wrong. 15 And if another believer is distressed by what you eat, you are not acting in love if you eat it. Don’t let your eating ruin someone for whom Christ died. 16 Then you will not be criticized for doing something you believe is good. 17 For the Kingdom of God is not a matter of what we eat or drink, but of living a life of goodness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. 18 If you serve Christ with this attitude, you will please God, and others will approve of you, too. 19 So then, let us aim for harmony in the church and try to build each other up.

Those who style their ha

Leanna Mae link
5/8/2025 01:42:47

Liz,
In your faith, do you believe we need to obey the scriptures? As a general belief, do you think we should strive to follow what the New Testament teaches? Is obedience necessary to follow Jesus?

On a side note, I don't own a television and I don't entertain myself with any form of Hollywood. The men in my church still don't do beards (although I see nothing sinful about them). Old-time holiness is my pursuit because I don't want to get lost in the world's entertainment. The church does have its own culture and some things are far too extreme and legalistic. Nevertheless, my heart desires holiness because that is the way of the Lord. I don't follow a denomination or whatever is socially acceptable in my congregation. I walk my own path, and everything I do or don't do has a reason for it.

Reply
Liz
5/8/2025 02:04:01

The answer to these questions is yes, of course. However, I still haven't found the scripture that says a woman cutting her hair is a sin. Proverbs 6: 16-19, Galatians 5: 19-21, and 1 Corinthians 6: 9-10; tell us examples of sin. None of them have anything to do with our appearance, but in how we conduct ourselves. I find apostolics and pentecostals to be too obsessed with the outside when God is going to be judging our heart posture. It's a heart issue. God bless.

Liz
5/8/2025 02:17:25

One other thing, I strive for Jesus' definition of holiness and not what old time religion thinks holiness is.

Liz
5/8/2025 02:20:35

For some reason my response was not together. Here it is.

The answer to these questions is yes, of course. However, I still haven't found the scripture that says a woman cutting her hair is a sin. Proverbs 6: 16-19, Galatians 5: 19-21, and 1 Corinthians 6: 9-10; tell us examples of sin. None of them have anything to do with our appearance, but in how we conduct ourselves. I find apostolics and pentecostals to be too obsessed with the outside when God is going to be judging our heart posture. I am striving for Jesus' definition of holiness and not what religion thinks holiness is. God bless and be with you.


Evelyn Sepulveda Lebrón
5/9/2025 13:10:01

I have never read something more accurate and biblical about women hair. Thank you. God bless you!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Thank you for visiting!
    ​Have you
    read my
    beautiful books yet?
    Picture
    Read
    Picture
    Read
    Picture
    Read

Leanna Mae is a small-town Ohio girl who loves to write. She’s the author of several nonfiction paperback books: Happily Frugal, The Subject of Salvation, and Lessons on the Author Life. She has also written many blogs, and focuses on sharing her faith through blogging. Her heart's desire is to reach the world with the message of her faith through her website. Leanna is a devout Christian, Apostolic Pentecostal. Her degree is in health sciences. Leanna Mae is an author, women's health educator, and birth doula. She’s passionate about Jesus, her faith, writing, and teaching. She is also passionate about patient rights, healthcare ethics, and women’s health. You can learn more about Leanna Mae, her books, blogs, and services by exploring www.LeannaMae.org


Leanna Mae

Apostolic Pentecostal Christian

international author

maternal-infant wellness educator

birth doula

breastfeeding specialist

Copyright © 2013-2025       Leanna Mae       All rights reserved
If this website has been a helpful resource to you, consider donating any dollar amount here.
Donations allow more time to write blogs and build this resource that is freely available to all.

  • Home
  • About Leanna
  • My Christian Faith
    • My faith journey
    • Written by an Apostolic Pentecostal woman
    • bible study from The Subject of Salvation
    • Bible reading schedules
  • My books
    • where to purchase
    • Happily Frugal
    • The Subject of Salvation
    • Lessons on the Author Life
    • press kit
  • My blogs
    • topical blog directory
    • timeline blog directory
    • the scroll
  • Maternal Infant Wellness Education
  • Classes I teach
  • Birth & Breastfeeding Support
    • Doula Leanna
  • Shop
  • Donate
  • Contact